PRINT
THIS SECTION Comprehensive spending review 2007
What it needs to deliver on child poverty
Introduce free at the point of delivery good-quality childcare
Two key advantages are attributable to good childcare: the ability
of parents to work and developmental gains for the child. Both are
critical to improving life chances for the poorest children. There
is growing recognition of the centrality of childcare to government
objectives, culminating in the Treasury publishing, in December
2004, a ten-year childcare strategy. The strategy not only underlies
the importance of childcare to government objectives, but details
welcome changes to address some of the manifest problems with current
provision.
Current provision is primarily market-based with a government demandside
subsidy provided through working tax credit, and with supply-side
intervention through nursery places for three- and four-year-olds,
Sure Start children's centres and out-of-hours school-based provision.
The December 2004 Pre-Budget Report extended each of these
(dates of implementation vary by reform): increasing the proportion
of childcare costs claimable (from 70 to 80 per cent) and the childcare
maximums; increasing the extent of free nursery entitlement for
three- and four-yearolds; introducing children's centres in each
community by 2010. CPAG welcomes these reforms and the Government's
acknowledgement that this is an area where policy has not gone far
enough. Good as it is, more is needed to tackle the inadequacy of
childcare, and we still lack the commitment to universal, free at
the point of delivery childcare required to support fully the eradication
of child poverty.
The problem with current policy is that it falls down before two
hurdles: excessive expense and inadequate supply. Both factors bear
most heavily on the poorest. The typical cost (2006 prices) of a
full-time nursery place for a child under two in England is £142
a week.52 In some
parts of the country, particularly London and the South East, the
cost of a nursery place is even higher - normally £197 a week in
Inner London. The typical cost of a full-time place with a childminder
for a child under two is £132 a week, and nannies cost anything
from £250 to £500 a week, depending on whether they live in or out.
Although the Government provides help with the cost of childcare
for low-income families through working tax credit, the current
average award is just £49.80 a week,53
and there is no extra help for parents with three or more children.
As for supply, there is only one registered childcare place for
every four children under the age of eight.54
Moreover, there is an inverse relationship between childcare availability
and area deprivation. Deprived wards have about half the national
average number of childcare places.55
High turnover is another problem in the provision of paid-for childcare.
According to a recent Public Accounts Committee inquiry into early
years provision, of 626,000 new full-time places, 48.1per cent have
already closed down.56
High turnover is likely to be greatest in poorer areas where profits
may be relatively low and demand suppressed by parents' inability
to afford provision. Quality is likely to be impaired by high turnover
of staff and projects, and again this is likely to disadvantage
the poorer areas disproportionately.
CPAG recognises that providing a sustainable universal childcare
service is a complex undertaking. In addition to issues of principle,
there are workplace issues around the number of child carers, and
the training and remuneration they receive. These workplace issues,
in part being addressed as part of ongoing policy reform, are critical
to creating a service that is not only of good quality - sufficient
to maximise child development - but is also sustainable. Still,
we believe that greater urgency needs to be placed on rolling out
children's centres as a vehicle for childcare (and other services).
In the short term, sustainable ways must be sought of making more
childcare available in deprived areas, as well as ensuring a greater
variety of provision to match need. The long-term ambition should
be universal childcare, free at the point of delivery, and the immediate
priority is to establish an action plan with steps to get there,
starting now.
Notes
52 Daycare Trust, Childcare Costs 2006, at www.daycaretrust.org.uk
53 See K Stanley, K Bellamy and G Cooke, Equal Access? Appropriate
and affordable childcare for every child, Institute for Public
Policy Research, 2006
54 See note 52
55 Strategy Unit, Delivering for Children and Families,
2002, section 3.1.2; also see Department for Education and Skills,
Department for Education and Skills: five year strategy for
children and learners Cn6272, July 2004, p21 for graphical
illustration by local authority.
56 Public Accounts Committee, Early Years: progress in developing
high quality childcare and early education accessible to all,
House of Commons, September 2004, HC-444, para 3
Comprehensive spending review 2007
What it needs to deliver on child poverty
Contents page
Introduction
The Government’s record
What should the spending review deliver?
Provide most for those children at greatest
risk of poverty
Work towards better jobs, not just more
jobs
Ensure the safety net protects families
against poverty
Maximise the contribution of child benefit
within family support
Introduce free at the point of delivery
good-quality childcare
Make the reduction of child poverty central
to the new child support policies
Make education truly free at the point
of delivery
Provide benefit entitlement to all UK
residents equally, irrespective of immigration status
Reduce the disproportionate burden of
taxation on poorer families
Improve the quality of delivery and gear
it to the needs of the poorest families
Notes
Print the entire
document
|